Submit a report

Announcements

We are recruiting recommenders (editors) from all research fields!

Your feedback matters! If you have authored or reviewed a Registered Report at Peer Community in Registered Reports, then please take 5 minutes to leave anonymous feedback about your experience, and view community ratings.


 

51

Action-Inaction Asymmetries in Emotions and Counterfactual ‎Thoughts: Meta-Analysis of the Action Effect‎use asterix (*) to get italics
Siu Kit Yeung, Gilad FeldmanPlease use the format "First name initials family name" as in "Marie S. Curie, Niels H. D. Bohr, Albert Einstein, John R. R. Tolkien, Donna T. Strickland"
2022
<p>Action-effect refers to the phenomenon in which people experience, associate, or attribute stronger emotions for action compared to inaction. In this registered report, we conducted a meta-analysis of the action effect literature (k = [enter number of studies by Stage 2], N = [enter no. of participants by Stage 2], 1982-2021). We found support/no support/mixed support for action-effect in [positive emotions, g = X.XX, 95% CI [X.XX, X.XX]], support/no support/mixed support for action-effect in [negative emotions, g = X.XX, 95% CI [X.XX, X.XX]], and support/no support/mixed support for action-effect in [counterfactual thought, g = X.XX, 95% CI [X.XX, X.XX]]. Study heterogeneity was [low / low to medium / medium / medium to high / high], Q(XX) = XXX.XX, p = .XXX / &lt; .001, I² = XX.XX%. [Summarize results of publication bias tests; to be completed by Stage 2]. Action-effect was stronger [list of conditions in which the effects were stronger, if there was/were, to be entered by Stage 2]. We pre-registered our meta-analysis, with all search protocol, datasets, code, and supplementary made available on the OSF: https://osf.io/acm24/ .</p>
You should fill this box only if you chose 'All or part of the results presented in this preprint are based on data'. URL must start with http:// or https://
You should fill this box only if you chose 'Scripts were used to obtain or analyze the results'. URL must start with http:// or https://
You should fill this box only if you chose 'Codes have been used in this study'. URL must start with http:// or https://
Action-effect; Action; Inaction; Meta-Analysis; Registered Report; Regret
NonePlease indicate the methods that may require specialised expertise during the peer review process (use a comma to separate various required expertises).
Social sciences
No need for them to be recommenders of PCI Registered Reports. Please do not suggest reviewers for whom there might be a conflict of interest. Reviewers are not allowed to review preprints written by close colleagues (with whom they have published in the last four years, with whom they have received joint funding in the last four years, or with whom they are currently writing a manuscript, or submitting a grant proposal), or by family members, friends, or anyone for whom bias might affect the nature of the review - see the code of conduct
e.g. John Doe [john@doe.com]
2021-07-16 14:02:56
Chris Chambers