Submit a report

Announcements

Please note that we will be CLOSED to ALL SUBMISSIONS from 1 December 2024 through 12 January 2025 to give our recommenders and reviewers a holiday break.

We are recruiting recommenders (editors) from all research fields!

Your feedback matters! If you have authored or reviewed a Registered Report at Peer Community in Registered Reports, then please take 5 minutes to leave anonymous feedback about your experience, and view community ratings.

572

Is conscious perception necessary to direct attention? A replication of Jiang et al. (2006)use asterix (*) to get italics
Yung-Jung Chen, Ryan B Scott, Zoltan DienesPlease use the format "First name initials family name" as in "Marie S. Curie, Niels H. D. Bohr, Albert Einstein, John R. R. Tolkien, Donna T. Strickland"
2023
<p>The relationship between attention and consciousness has been debated for the past few decades. Observing attentional biases induced by visual stimuli below conscious threshold is one way of providing evidence for the independence of attention and conscious perception. Among such studies, Jiang et al. (2006) found a strong priming effect below the objective conscious threshold with high sensitivity, in showing attentional biases to nude images suppressed by continuous flash suppression (CFS). This study aims to replicate Jiang et al. by following the original design and materials as closely as possible with Bayesian analytical approaches.&nbsp;</p>
You should fill this box only if you chose 'All or part of the results presented in this preprint are based on data'. URL must start with http:// or https://
You should fill this box only if you chose 'Scripts were used to obtain or analyze the results'. URL must start with http:// or https://
You should fill this box only if you chose 'Codes have been used in this study'. URL must start with http:// or https://
unconscious attention, continuous flash suppression, priming, consciousness, attention
NonePlease indicate the methods that may require specialised expertise during the peer review process (use a comma to separate various required expertises).
Social sciences
Michael Graziano [graziano@princeton.edu] suggested: Aaron Schurger, Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg [shlomitgr@tau.ac.il] suggested: I am sorry that I am unable to review at the moment. , Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg [shlomitgr@tau.ac.il] suggested: I recommend that you try Liad Mudrik from Tel Aviv University. , Lina Skora [l.skora@hhu.de] suggested: Timo Stein t.stein@uva.nl , Surya Gayet suggested: Sjoerd Stuit - s.m.stuit@uu.nl
e.g. John Doe john@doe.com
No need for them to be recommenders of PCI Registered Reports. Please do not suggest reviewers for whom there might be a conflict of interest. Reviewers are not allowed to review preprints written by close colleagues (with whom they have published in the last four years, with whom they have received joint funding in the last four years, or with whom they are currently writing a manuscript, or submitting a grant proposal), or by family members, friends, or anyone for whom bias might affect the nature of the review - see the code of conduct
e.g. John Doe john@doe.com
2023-10-11 22:02:33
Reshanne Reeder