
A gender difference in effort moralization?

See me, judge me, pay me: Gendered effort moralization in work and care
Abstract
Recommendation: posted 20 May 2025, validated 20 May 2025
Fillon, A. (2025) A gender difference in effort moralization?. Peer Community in Registered Reports, 101009. https://doi.org/10.24072/pci.rr.101009
This is a stage 2 based on:
Leopold H. O. Roth, Tassilo T. Tissot, Thea Fischer, S. Charlotte Masak
https://osf.io/rz6yu
Recommendation
Level of bias control achieved: Level 6. No part of the data or evidence that was used to answer the research question was generated until after IPA.
List of eligible PCI RR-friendly journals:
- Collabra: Psychology
- Experimental Psychology
- International Review of Social Psychology
- Peer Community Journal
- PeerJ
- Royal Society Open Science
- Social Psychological Bulletin
- Studia Psychologica
- Swiss Psychology Open
The recommender in charge of the evaluation of the article and the reviewers declared that they have no conflict of interest (as defined in the code of conduct of PCI) with the authors or with the content of the article.
Evaluation round #2
DOI or URL of the report: https://osf.io/preprints/osf/wkbs6_v2
Version of the report: 2
Author's Reply, 16 May 2025
Dear Adrien,
thank you very much for your suggested changes and for keeping an eye on the details, while navigating us through this project.
We adapted all suggested changes by you in the manuscript and updated the pre-print accordingly.
Hopefully, we did so appropriately.
Have a good end of the week, and we are looking forward to hearing back from you.
Best regards
Leopold
Decision by Adrien Fillon
, posted 13 May 2025, validated 13 May 2025
Dear researchers,
I read your answer to both reviewers and think that you answered properly.
Below you can find an annotated version of your manuscript. Most of my comments are typo's corrections but I also think that you can discuss a bit more the exclusion of participants who did not perceived the effort situation and have a look at the abstract and conclusion regarding a "contrary to previous studies" that was screened by the reviewer Jared Celniker.
Looking forward to receiving a final version,
Adrien Fillon
Download recommender's annotationsEvaluation round #1
DOI or URL of the report: https://osf.io/preprints/osf/wkbs6_v1
Version of the report: 1
Author's Reply, 02 May 2025
Decision by Adrien Fillon
, posted 10 Apr 2025, validated 10 Apr 2025
Dear authors,
The two reviewers of the stage 1 agreed to review the manuscript once again. They both agreed that the manuscript is consistent between the stages. They still both have suggestions to improve the discussion and found several modifications to perform.
I attached to this message reviewer's 2 review (called Stage 2 Review.docx).
When submitting the next version, please add a response to reviewer letter explaining your changes regarding the reviewer's comments.
Good luck with the revision,
Adrien Fillon
Download recommender's annotations