Submit a report

Announcements

Please note that we will be CLOSED to ALL SUBMISSIONS from 1 December 2024 through 12 January 2025 to give our recommenders and reviewers a holiday break.

We are recruiting recommenders (editors) from all research fields!

Your feedback matters! If you have authored or reviewed a Registered Report at Peer Community in Registered Reports, then please take 5 minutes to leave anonymous feedback about your experience, and view community ratings.

493

Sugary drinks devaluation with response training helps to resist to their consumptionuse asterix (*) to get italics
Hugo Najberg, Malika Tapparel, Lucas SpiererPlease use the format "First name initials family name" as in "Marie S. Curie, Niels H. D. Bohr, Albert Einstein, John R. R. Tolkien, Donna T. Strickland"
2023
<p style="text-align: justify;">Food response training has been shown to reduce the reported value of palatable food items. These approaches may thus help to reduce unhealthy (over)consumption behaviors and its related diseases. Yet, whether and how training-induced devaluation effects translate into reductions in the target items (over)consumption remains unclear.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">We will address this issue by testing whether a combined food Go/NoGo and cue-approach training targeting the participants’ favorite sugary drinks can improve how many days they resist drinking them with a double-blind randomized controlled trial. We will further examine the association between the devaluation of the target food cues and the real-world effect of the training on adherence to the restrictive diet, and the impact of the length of the training intervention.</p>
You should fill this box only if you chose 'All or part of the results presented in this preprint are based on data'. URL must start with http:// or https://
You should fill this box only if you chose 'Scripts were used to obtain or analyze the results'. URL must start with http:// or https://
You should fill this box only if you chose 'Codes have been used in this study'. URL must start with http:// or https://
response training; food; diet
NonePlease indicate the methods that may require specialised expertise during the peer review process (use a comma to separate various required expertises).
Medical Sciences
Pieter Van Dessel suggested: Eva Van Malderen (eva.vanmalderen@ugent.be), Matthias Aulbach suggested: Natalia Lawrence Natalia.Lawrence@exeter.ac.uk , Matthias Aulbach suggested: Lucy Porter L.M.Porter@lboro.ac.uk
e.g. John Doe john@doe.com
No need for them to be recommenders of PCI Registered Reports. Please do not suggest reviewers for whom there might be a conflict of interest. Reviewers are not allowed to review preprints written by close colleagues (with whom they have published in the last four years, with whom they have received joint funding in the last four years, or with whom they are currently writing a manuscript, or submitting a grant proposal), or by family members, friends, or anyone for whom bias might affect the nature of the review - see the code of conduct
e.g. John Doe john@doe.com
2023-06-22 12:01:20
Zhang Chen