Submit a report

Announcements

Please note that we will be CLOSED to ALL SUBMISSIONS from 1 December 2024 through 12 January 2025 to give our recommenders and reviewers a holiday break.

We are recruiting recommenders (editors) from all research fields!

Your feedback matters! If you have authored or reviewed a Registered Report at Peer Community in Registered Reports, then please take 5 minutes to leave anonymous feedback about your experience, and view community ratings.

610

Replication of “Carbon-Dot-Based Dual-Emission Nanohybrid Produces a Ratiometric Fluorescent Sensor for In Vivo Imaging of Cellular Copper Ions”use asterix (*) to get italics
Maha Said, Mustafa Gharib, Samia Zrig, Raphaël Lévy Please use the format "First name initials family name" as in "Marie S. Curie, Niels H. D. Bohr, Albert Einstein, John R. R. Tolkien, Donna T. Strickland"
2023
<p>In hundreds of articles published over the past two decades, nanoparticles have been described as probes for sensing and imaging of a variety of intracellular cytosolic targets. However, nanoparticles generally enter cells by endocytosis with only a small fraction reaching the cytosol. Most of those articles do not describe the mechanisms of nanoparticles entry into the cell and therefore the paradox of sensing a target in the cytosol when most particles do not access that compartment remains. To address this paradox, we are initiating a replication project of some of the most influential articles in this field with the aim of confirming their ability to detect their targets and getting additional insights into their intracellular localisation. Thus, this article is a pre-registered report for the first replication of this project, namely the replication of Zhu et al ‘Carbon‐Dot‐Based Dual‐Emission Nanohybrid Produces a Ratiometric Fluorescent Sensor for In Vivo Imaging of Cellular Copper Ions’. To achieve our aim, we will carry out both a direct replication of the experiments in the original article, with the addition of some experiments and controls, and a conceptual replication where we test the claim that this ratiometric probe is able to sense intracellular copper levels in a more biologically relevant system. We hope that this study will contribute to a better understanding of the intracellular fate of nanoparticles and, with the help of the scientific community, help set standards in the design and reporting of studies in this field.</p>
You should fill this box only if you chose 'All or part of the results presented in this preprint are based on data'. URL must start with http:// or https://
You should fill this box only if you chose 'Scripts were used to obtain or analyze the results'. URL must start with http:// or https://
You should fill this box only if you chose 'Codes have been used in this study'. URL must start with http:// or https://
copper sensing, endosomal escape, nanoparticles, nanoprobe, replication, wilson's disease
NonePlease indicate the methods that may require specialised expertise during the peer review process (use a comma to separate various required expertises).
Life Sciences, Medical Sciences, Physical Sciences
Zeljka Krpetic suggested: Reproducibility in nanoscience is of great importance because small variations in sample parameters or measurements can significantly impact the results and conclusions. Ensuring the reliability and validity of scientific findings in nanoscience, as well as the implementation of newly developed and validated protocols as well as nanoparticle-based systems widely is important, as we face new challenges posed by multi-drug resistance, expensive diagnostic tools and antimicrobial resistance challenges inspiring the new nanotechnology-based diagnostic and therapeutic tools. This becomes very important in nanomedicine, a field offering a wide possibility of applications from drug-delivery, intracellular sensing to applications in novel medicines and therapeutic approaches using nanomaterials. , Zeljka Krpetic suggested: Challenges in reproducibility are not limited to biological experiments with nanoparticles; they also arise from experimental design and technical execution. , Zeljka Krpetic suggested: Routine particle characterisation and the choice of methods for physico-chemical analysis play key roles in describing systems designed for biomedical applications. , Zeljka Krpetic suggested: One major challenge is the reproducibility of particle synthesis methods, and its scaleup. Different parameters such as temperature, pH, stirring rate, experimental conditions, impurities, and the choice of glassware during synthesis and equipment can influence particle batches and ultimately particle size, shape, monodispersity, and stability in biological media which all impacts the bio-nano interactions with the living cells. Addressing batch-to-batch reproducibility with robust characterisation methods is essential for planning any serious biological application of nanomaterials, ensuring reliable and reproducible outcomes. , Zeljka Krpetic suggested: To mitigate these challenges, a quality scale-up of synthesis is proposed to avoid batch-to-batch variability during synthesis replication. Followed with a well-planned and customised selection of physico-chemical characterisation methods for particle size determination and stability evaluation in relevant media is recommended, in function of the particle size and surface chemistry. Coupling these methods with statistical analysis, though not always customary in nanoparticle analysis, will provide a more robust approach, but also add more complexity over more traditional approaches. , Zeljka Krpetic suggested: The proposed work aims to answer important questions about endosomal escape, a previously raised issue [1], or at least to contribute understanding. The new proposed method of optical microscopy herein is expected to provide additional insights, such as distinguishing between nanoparticles that have escaped the endosome and those that have directly crossed the membrane into the cytosol, which is not unequivocally possible with using just the traditionally used TEM. , Zeljka Krpetic suggested: In bionanotechnology, the use of controls is not a well-established practice. Including controls for particles designed to circumvent endocytosis is proposed as a positive control setup in the studied cellular system. This work will significantly contribute to re-evaluating the use of statistics in nanoscience, as many commonly used biological assays are inadequate when nanoparticle-based drugs are employed. , Zeljka Krpetic suggested: Interestingly, the authors report false positives in the selection of articles for evaluation. Including these articles for full justification of the article choice selection would be beneficial. The authors also propose cytotoxicity measurements using more than one commonly used biological assay, demonstrating a robust experimental plan with a clear rationale for using the more sensitive Alamar Blue assay. To correlate results across different assays, the use of FACS is proposed to validate viability results, understand cell death pathways, dynamics, and enhance experimental reproducibility, generating high-quality data with established protocols. [2] , Zeljka Krpetic suggested: In addition to the planned characterization methods, it is proposed to include Differential Centrifugal Sedimentation (DCS) for high-resolution nanoparticle analysis in relevant biological fluids used for in vitro analysis. This will assess the overall stability of the dispersions and exclude the formation of aggregates that can significantly impact biological assessment outcomes for ultra-small nanoparticles [3]. Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) is also suggested for reproducible nanoparticle concentration measurements, which are important for dosing of the particles in biological experiments. , Zeljka Krpetic suggested: This study is holds a high hope to advance our understanding of the reproducibility in field of nanomedicine by addressing challenges in adapting synthesis to reduce batch-to-batch variability, validating physico-chemical characterization tools, and ensuring the reliability of cell viability tests. It will identify best practices in operative procedures, create opportunities for standardizing measurements and in vitro assessment approaches, and ultimately guide new commercial opportunities, regulatory requirements, and wider applications in futire clinical trials. , Zeljka Krpetic suggested: 1. Željka Krpetić, Samia Saleemi, Ian A. Prior, Violaine Sée, Rumana Qureshi, and Mathias Brust. Negotiation of Intracellular Membrane Barriers by TAT-Modified Gold Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2011, 5 (6), 5195-5520. DOI: 10.1021/nn201369k , Zeljka Krpetic suggested: 2. Anna Salvati, Inge Nelissen, Andrea Haase, Christoffer Åberg, Sergio Moya, An Jacobs, Fatima Alnasser, Tony Bewersdorff, Sarah Deville, Andreas Luch, Kenneth A. Dawson. Quantitative measurement of nanoparticle uptake by flow cytometry illustrated by an interlaboratory comparison of the uptake of labelled polystyrene nanoparticles, NanoImpact, 2018, 9, 42-50, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2017.10.004. , Zeljka Krpetic suggested: 3. Perez-Potti, A., Lopez, H., Pelaz, B. et al. In depth characterisation of the biomolecular coronas of polymer coated inorganic nanoparticles with differential centrifugal sedimentation. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 6443. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84029-8 No need for them to be recommenders of PCI Registered Reports. Please do not suggest reviewers for whom there might be a conflict of interest. Reviewers are not allowed to review preprints written by close colleagues (with whom they have published in the last four years, with whom they have received joint funding in the last four years, or with whom they are currently writing a manuscript, or submitting a grant proposal), or by family members, friends, or anyone for whom bias might affect the nature of the review - see the code of conduct
e.g. John Doe [john@doe.com]
2023-11-29 19:14:03
Emily Linnane