Test-Retest Reliability of the STRAQ-1: A Registered Reportuse asterix (*) to get italics

Olivier Dujols, Siegwart Lindenberg, Caspar J. van Lissa, Hans IJzermanPlease use the format "First name initials family name" as in "Marie S. Curie, Niels H. D. Bohr, Albert Einstein, John R. R. Tolkien, Donna T. Strickland"

2024

<p>This Registered Report provides the first test of measurement invariance across time points and estimates of test-retest reliability for the Social Thermoregulation, Risk Avoidance Questionnaire (STRAQ-1, Vergara et al., 2019). The scale was developed and validated to understand the physiological drives underlying interpersonal bonding, measured by four constructs: the desire to socially regulate one’s temperature, the desire to solitary regulate one’s temperature, the sensitivity to higher temperatures, and the desire to avoid risk. Previous studies with large samples across 12 countries showed that the STRAQ-1 has a stable factorial structure, satisfying internal consistencies for the temperature subscales, and expected correlations in its nomological network. However, to date, this instrument has no estimates of test-retest reliability. Throughout four academic years (from 2018 to 2022), <em>N</em> = 183 French student participants took the STRAQ-1 at least two times. Out of the four STRAQ-1 subscales, four were longitudinally non-invariant across two-time points. The constructs and latent scores were thus dissimilar and incomparable across time. We then conducted test-retest reliability using Intra Class Correlation coefficient (ICC) for the Social Thermoregulation, Solitary Thermoregulation, High-Temperature Sensitivity, and Risk Avoidance subscales. ICCs estimates were respectively for agreement and consistency: .70, .70 overall moderate to good, .62, .62 overall moderate, .67, .67 overall moderate, and .53, .53 overall poor to moderate, respectively. We discuss our findings in regard to the relatively long time between the repeated measures.</p> <p>Keywords: Test-Retest, Longitudinal Measurement Invariance, Attachment Theory, Social Thermoregulation, Registered Report</p>

Test-Retest, Longitudinal Measurement Invariance, Attachment Theory, Social Thermoregulation, Registered Report

NonePlease indicate the methods that may require specialised expertise during the peer review process (use a comma to separate various required expertises).

Social sciences

Kateryna Keefer [katerynakeefer@trentu.ca] suggested: Geoff Navara, geoffnavara@trentu.ca

e.g. John Doe john@doe.com

No need for them to be recommenders of PCI Registered Reports. Please do not suggest reviewers for whom there might be a conflict of interest. Reviewers are not allowed to review preprints written by close colleagues (with whom they have published in the last four years, with whom they have received joint funding in the last four years, or with whom they are currently writing a manuscript, or submitting a grant proposal), or by family members, friends, or anyone for whom bias might affect the nature of the review - see the code of conduct

2024-01-11 16:01:41

Moin Syed