Self-Affirmation and Prejudice Against Religious Groups: The Role of Ideological Malleabilityuse asterix (*) to get italics

Yara Alnajjar, Constantina Badea and Béatrice SternbergPlease use the format "First name initials family name" as in "Marie S. Curie, Niels H. D. Bohr, Albert Einstein, John R. R. Tolkien, Donna T. Strickland"

2024

<p>Self-affirmation has shown mixed findings when used as a prejudice reduction technique, sometimes diminishing prejudice while sometimes increasing it or having no significant effect. In a Registered Report experiment with a French representative sample (N = 602), we tested whether ideological malleability (participants’ representation of secularism) influences the effectiveness of the self-affirmation procedure in reducing prejudice against religious groups. After reporting their representation of secularism, participants were either asked to self-affirm on a threat-related value (secularism), or to self-affirm on a threat-unrelated value (humor), or were assigned to a control condition. Finally, affective and behavioral prejudice against religious groups (Muslims and Christians) were measured.&nbsp;</p> <p>Results show that participants who reported a “new” representation of secularism exhibited more prejudice towards religious groups than those who endorsed a “historical” representation of secularism. This difference was higher concerning prejudice towards Muslims as compared to Christians. We failed to find empirical evidence showing that the effect of self-affirmation on prejudice depends on ideological malleability, for either affective or behavioral dimensions. Contrary to our hypothesis, self-affirmation on secularism decreased affective prejudice compared to the other conditions. We discuss this result based on an exploratory content analysis of participants’ writings in the self-affirmation task.</p> <p>This study adds to the literature by clearly demonstrating that new vs. historical representations of secularism are associated with different levels of prejudice against religious groups, particularly Muslims. Future research should develop better interventions based on self-affirmation theory. All materials, data, and code are available on: <a href="https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/63RNQ">OSF</a>.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>

self-affirmation, ideological malleability, prejudice, religious groups

NonePlease indicate the methods that may require specialised expertise during the peer review process (use a comma to separate various required expertises).

Social sciences

Pete Harris suggested: I am sorry but this has come right at the start of the summer school holidays and I have commitments in September that mean I won't be working again until the middle of September. Please feel free to proceed without my input if that seems best and, if so, pass on my apologies to the authors., Marco Iacoboni suggested: I don't have suggestions and I am sorry to decline, but I am traveling in the old country taking care of two very old parents (90 and 94) and have no time to do this, Rosalind Chow suggested: Kody Manke, Alison Chasteen suggested: Interfaith prejudice was the focus of one of my former graduate students, Veronica Bergstrom. You can reach her at Veronica Bergstrom <vnzbergstrom@gmail.com>., Kody Manke suggested: Kevin Binning kbinning@pitt.edu , Kody Manke suggested: Rene Kizilcec kizilcec@cornell.edu, David Sherman suggested: Constantina Badea <cbadea@parisnanterre.fr>, Oliver Klein suggested: Pascaline Van Oost <pascaline.vanoost@uclouvain.be> , Oliver Klein suggested: Vincent Yzerbyt (Vincent.yzerbyt@uclouvain.be) , Oliver Klein suggested: Serge Guimond (serge.guimond@uca.fr), Sa-kiera Hudson suggested: Apologies. I am going into my heavy teaching part of the semester and have a lot less time. , Sa-kiera Hudson suggested: Mikey Pasek: mpasek@uic.edu

e.g. John Doe john@doe.com

No need for them to be recommenders of PCI Registered Reports. Please do not suggest reviewers for whom there might be a conflict of interest. Reviewers are not allowed to review preprints written by close colleagues (with whom they have published in the last four years, with whom they have received joint funding in the last four years, or with whom they are currently writing a manuscript, or submitting a grant proposal), or by family members, friends, or anyone for whom bias might affect the nature of the review - see the code of conduct

2024-07-30 11:57:10

Anna Elisabeth Fürtjes