Submit a report

Announcements

We are recruiting recommenders (editors) from all research fields!

Your feedback matters! If you have authored or reviewed a Registered Report at Peer Community in Registered Reports, then please take 5 minutes to leave anonymous feedback about your experience, and view community ratings.


 

339

Somatosensory Response Changes During Illusory Finger Stretching use asterix (*) to get italics
Kirralise J. Hansford, Daniel H. Baker, Kirsten J. McKenzie & Catherine E. J. PrestonPlease use the format "First name initials family name" as in "Marie S. Curie, Niels H. D. Bohr, Albert Einstein, John R. R. Tolkien, Donna T. Strickland"
2023
<p>Resizing illusions, delivered using augmented reality, resize a body part through either stretching or shrinking manipulations. These resizing illusions have been investigated in visuotactile, visual-only and visuo-auditory presentations. However, the neural underpinnings of these resizing illusions remain undefined. This study seeks to understand the neural mechanisms behind these illusions in healthy participants, by using somatosensory steady state evoked potentials in addition to subjective self-report questionnaires, to enhance knowledge of what drives the subjective embodiment during resizing illusions. Resizing Illusions have been shown to provide analgesic effects for individuals with chronic pain conditions, therefore, this study also aims to provide an empirical basis for later investigations in chronic pain samples undergoing resizing illusions. [results and conclusions to be added].&nbsp;</p>
You should fill this box only if you chose 'All or part of the results presented in this preprint are based on data'. URL must start with http:// or https://
You should fill this box only if you chose 'Scripts were used to obtain or analyze the results'. URL must start with http:// or https://
You should fill this box only if you chose 'Codes have been used in this study'. URL must start with http:// or https://
Somatosensory Evoked Potentials, EEG, Resizing Illusions
NonePlease indicate the methods that may require specialised expertise during the peer review process (use a comma to separate various required expertises).
Life Sciences, Medical Sciences
No need for them to be recommenders of PCI Registered Reports. Please do not suggest reviewers for whom there might be a conflict of interest. Reviewers are not allowed to review preprints written by close colleagues (with whom they have published in the last four years, with whom they have received joint funding in the last four years, or with whom they are currently writing a manuscript, or submitting a grant proposal), or by family members, friends, or anyone for whom bias might affect the nature of the review - see the code of conduct
e.g. John Doe [john@doe.com]
2022-11-15 17:17:18
D. Samuel Schwarzkopf