Submit a report

Announcements

We are recruiting recommenders (editors) from all research fields!

Your feedback matters! If you have authored or reviewed a Registered Report at Peer Community in Registered Reports, then please take 5 minutes to leave anonymous feedback about your experience, and view community ratings.


 

595

Lure of choice revisited: Replication and extensions Registered Report of Bown et al. (2003)use asterix (*) to get italics
Nga Yi (Angela) Chan, Gilad FeldmanPlease use the format "First name initials family name" as in "Marie S. Curie, Niels H. D. Bohr, Albert Einstein, John R. R. Tolkien, Donna T. Strickland"
2024
<p>[IMPORTANT: Abstract, method, and results were written using a randomised dataset produced by Qualtrics to simulate what these sections will look like after data collection. These will be updated following the data collection. For the purpose of the simulation, we wrote things in past tense, but no pre-registration or data collection took place yet.]</p> <p>The lure of choice is a heuristic that suggests people prefer options that allow them to make further choices over those that do not, even when the extra choices cannot improve the ultimate outcome. In a Registered Report, we conducted a replication and extensions of Studies 1, 2, and 3 from Bown et al. (2003), with a British Prolific sample (N = 1000). [The following is a demo placeholder and will be updated following data collection.] We [found/did not find] support for the lure of choice in the nightclub scenario (V = X.XX, 95% CI [X.XX, X.XX]), bank scenario (V = X.XX, 95% CI [X.XX, X.XX]), casino dominated lure condition (V = X.XX, 95% CI [X.XX, X.XX]), conflicted lure condition (V = X.XX, 95% CI [X.XX, X.XX]), and the Monty Hall problem scenario (V = X.XX, 95% CI [X.XX, X.XX]). Extending the replication, we added neutral control conditions and [found/did not find support] for the neutral control conditions as different from the experimental conditions [...details…]. Overall, we conclude that …. Materials, data, and code are available on: https://osf.io/e47jh/&nbsp;</p>
You should fill this box only if you chose 'All or part of the results presented in this preprint are based on data'. URL must start with http:// or https://
You should fill this box only if you chose 'Scripts were used to obtain or analyze the results'. URL must start with http:// or https://
You should fill this box only if you chose 'Codes have been used in this study'. URL must start with http:// or https://
replication, choice, decision making, lure of choice
NonePlease indicate the methods that may require specialised expertise during the peer review process (use a comma to separate various required expertises).
Social sciences
No need for them to be recommenders of PCI Registered Reports. Please do not suggest reviewers for whom there might be a conflict of interest. Reviewers are not allowed to review preprints written by close colleagues (with whom they have published in the last four years, with whom they have received joint funding in the last four years, or with whom they are currently writing a manuscript, or submitting a grant proposal), or by family members, friends, or anyone for whom bias might affect the nature of the review - see the code of conduct
e.g. John Doe [john@doe.com]
2023-11-15 00:40:47
Patrick Savage