PCI Registered Reports

Announcements

Please note that we will be CLOSED to ALL SUBMISSIONS from 1 December 2024 through 12 January 2025 to give our recommenders and reviewers a holiday break.

We are recruiting recommenders (editors) from all research fields!

Your feedback matters! If you have authored or reviewed a Registered Report at Peer Community in Registered Reports, then please take 5 minutes to leave anonymous feedback about your experience, and view community ratings.

Back

796

Title *

Independent Comparative Evaluation of the Pupil Neon - A New Mobile Eye-trackeruse asterix (*) to get italics

Authors *

Valentin Foucher, Alina Krug, Marian SauterPlease use the format "First name initials family name" as in "Marie S. Curie, Niels H. D. Bohr, Albert Einstein, John R. R. Tolkien, Donna T. Strickland"

Year *

2024

Picture

Abstract *

<p>Due to the rapid adoption of (mobile) eye-tracking devices in both academic and consumer research, it becomes more important that the increasing number of datasets is based on reliable recordings. This study provides an independent evaluation of the Pupil Neon (Pupil Labs GmbH), one of the newest and most affordable mobile eye-trackers, by comparing its performance on a variety of tasks to the EyeLink 1000 Plus (SR Research Ltd.). Using Ehinger et al. (2019)’s test battery, a set of 10 tasks evaluated the accuracy and its decay over time of some of the most common eye-tracking-related parameters: fixations, saccades, smooth pursuit, pupil dilation, microsaccades, blinks, and the influence of head motion on accuracy. Gaze position, eye movements and pupil diameter associated with each task were recorded simultaneously by the two eye-trackers and compared concurrently. The results provide some ideas on what singularities should be expected by the newer Pupil Neon for the recording of specific eye movements or the performance in various kinds of tasks.</p>

Indicate the full web address (DOI or URL) giving public access to these data (if you have any problems with the deposit of your data, please contact contact@rr.peercommunityin.org). *

You should fill this box only if you chose 'All or part of the results presented in this preprint are based on data'. URL must start with http:// or https://

Indicate the full web address (DOI or URL) giving public access to these scripts (if you have any problems with the deposit of your scripts, please contact contact@rr.peercommunityin.org). *

You should fill this box only if you chose 'Scripts were used to obtain or analyze the results'. URL must start with http:// or https://

Indicate the full web address (DOI, SWHID or URL) giving public access to these codes (if you have any problems with the deposit of your codes, please contact contact@rr.peercommunityin.org). *

You should fill this box only if you chose 'Codes have been used in this study'. URL must start with http:// or https://

Keywords (optional)

Eye-tracker, Eye-tracking, Gaze detection, Accuracy, Precision, Pupil dilation, Smooth pursuit, Microsaccades, Fixations, Blinks, Head movements, Calibration decay, EyeLink 1000, Pupil Neon.

Methods that require specific expertise (optional)

NonePlease indicate the methods that may require specialised expertise during the peer review process (use a comma to separate various required expertises).

Thematic fields *

Engineering, Life Sciences, Social sciences

Suggested reviewers - Suggest up to 10 reviewers (provide names and Email addresses). (Optional)

e.g. John Doe john@doe.com

No need for them to be recommenders of PCI Registered Reports. Please do not suggest reviewers for whom there might be a conflict of interest. Reviewers are not allowed to review preprints written by close colleagues (with whom they have published in the last four years, with whom they have received joint funding in the last four years, or with whom they are currently writing a manuscript, or submitting a grant proposal), or by family members, friends, or anyone for whom bias might affect the nature of the review - see the code of conduct

Opposed reviewers - Suggest up to 5 people not to invite as reviewers. (Optional)

e.g. John Doe john@doe.com

Submission date

2024-05-29 10:29:06

Recommender

Rima-Maria Rahal

Reviewers

or Register
Submit a report