PCI Registered Reports

Announcements

We are recruiting recommenders (editors) from all research fields!

Your feedback matters! If you have authored or reviewed a Registered Report at Peer Community in Registered Reports, then please take 5 minutes to leave anonymous feedback about your experience, and view community ratings.

Back

322

Title

Reconstructing Gaming Disorder: A Taxonomy by Registered Reportuse asterix (*) to get italics

Authors

Veli-Matti Karhulahti, Marcel Martončik, Miia Siutila, Solip Park, Yaewon Jin, Matúš Adamkovič, Tiina Auranen, Bora Na, Tae-Jin YoonPlease use the format "First name initials family name" as in "Marie S. Curie, Niels H. D. Bohr, Albert Einstein, John R. R. Tolkien, Donna T. Strickland"

Year

2023

Picture

Abstract

<p style="text-align: justify;">Videogames have become one of the most prevalent cultural forms around the world. While their role in art, pedagogy, and everyday life keeps growing, the health debates on videogame play—gaming—culminated in 2022 with the World Health Organization’s historical inclusion of “gaming disorder” in the International Classification of Diseases. This made gaming, next to gambling, the first and only type of behavior with a diagnostic category of addictive use. The above echoes a greater conflict between culture and human development: how can science address potential problems in intensive technology use, while intensive use is also globally integrated into healthy everyday living? To build a foundation for answering this question, this longitudinal multisite registered report constructs a taxonomy of intensive gaming by three levels: health, design interaction, and phenomenology of play. Based on rich mixed qualitative data (clinical and phenomenological interviews, diary-like entries, gaming logs) generated over three years with intensively gaming participants in Finland, Slovakia, and South Korea (total N=210–300), the study will produce a basis for a taxonomic system that helps distinguishing diverse life scenarios where gaming plays a significant role. As separate programmatic components, the study will additionally yield independent registered case reports based on the outlined methodological framework. </p>

Indicate the full web address (DOI or URL) giving public access to these data (if you have any problems with the deposit of your data, please contact contact@rr.peercommunityin.org).

You should fill this box only if you chose 'All or part of the results presented in this preprint are based on data'. URL must start with http:// or https://

Indicate the full web address (DOI or URL) giving public access to these scripts (if you have any problems with the deposit of your scripts, please contact contact@rr.peercommunityin.org).

You should fill this box only if you chose 'Scripts were used to obtain or analyze the results'. URL must start with http:// or https://

Indicate the full web address (DOI, SWHID or URL) giving public access to these codes (if you have any problems with the deposit of your codes, please contact contact@rr.peercommunityin.org).

You should fill this box only if you chose 'Codes have been used in this study'. URL must start with http:// or https://

Keywords

longitudinal design, medical philosophy, psychiatry, qualitative methods, video games

Methods that require specific expertise (optional)

NonePlease indicate the methods that may require specialised expertise during the peer review process (use a comma to separate various required expertises).

Thematic fields

Humanities, Medical Sciences, Social sciences

Suggested reviewers - Suggest up to 10 reviewers (provide names and Email addresses). (Optional)

No need for them to be recommenders of PCI Registered Reports. Please do not suggest reviewers for whom there might be a conflict of interest. Reviewers are not allowed to review preprints written by close colleagues (with whom they have published in the last four years, with whom they have received joint funding in the last four years, or with whom they are currently writing a manuscript, or submitting a grant proposal), or by family members, friends, or anyone for whom bias might affect the nature of the review - see the code of conduct

Opposed reviewers - Suggest up to 5 people not to invite as reviewers. (Optional)

e.g. John Doe [john@doe.com]

Submission date

2022-10-10 15:09:55

Recommender

Zoltan Dienes

Reviewers

Oluwaseyi Adeliyi, Abiola Akinnubi

or Register
Submit a report