Submit a report

Announcements

Please note that we will be CLOSED to ALL SUBMISSIONS from 1 December 2024 through 12 January 2025 to give our recommenders and reviewers a holiday break.

We are recruiting recommenders (editors) from all research fields!

Your feedback matters! If you have authored or reviewed a Registered Report at Peer Community in Registered Reports, then please take 5 minutes to leave anonymous feedback about your experience, and view community ratings.

394

Does childhood adversity alter opioid drug reward? A conceptual replication in outpatients before surgeryuse asterix (*) to get italics
Molly Carlyle1*, Malin Kvande*, Isabell M. Meier, Martin Trøstheim, Kaja Buen, Eira Nordeng Jensen, Gernot Ernst, Siri Leknes, Marie Eikemo (*denotes equal contribution)Please use the format "First name initials family name" as in "Marie S. Curie, Niels H. D. Bohr, Albert Einstein, John R. R. Tolkien, Donna T. Strickland"
2023
<p><strong>Introduction</strong>: Opioid analgesic treatment during surgery entails risk of persistent use. Experiences of childhood adversity have been shown to increase opioid reward in preclinical models, a finding recently extended to healthy humans. We tested whether childhood adversity similarly increased opioid reward, operationalised as drug-induced feeling good and drug liking, in outpatients receiving opioids on the operating table.&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong>: This observational study recruited patients entering a Norwegian hospital for an outpatient surgical procedure. An opioid intravenous opioid analgesic (remifentanil [Minto model, effect site concentration: 5ng/ml], or oxycodone [5mg]) was administered in the minutes before general anaesthesia. Verbal numerical ratings of feeling good and anxious were collected 1 minute before, and 1-3 minutes after opioid infusion. Ratings of drug liking, disliking, and feeling high were also collected after infusion. Patients (n = 151) completed measures of childhood adversity at a later date.</p> <p><strong>Results</strong>: Regression analyses revealed a modest yet significant negative association between childhood adversity and post-opioid liking (b = -0.06, p = 0.046) but no significant effect on feeling good (b = 0.01, p = 0.690) after the pre-operative opioid dose. Exploratory analyses showed that more childhood adversity was significantly associated with higher reports of anxiety, depression, loneliness, and pain catastrophising, however not with alcohol or other drug use, or with any other subjective drug effects.</p> <p><strong>Discussion</strong>: Ratings of feeling good and drug liking of medically prescribed opioids given before surgery were not higher after childhood adversity, and previous findings were not conceptually replicated. The discrepancy between current and prior results may be due to the context and stress related to the impending surgery, the short duration of drug exposure, and the relatively limited levels of high childhood adversity in the current sample compared to the original study. Exploratory analysis was consistent with the possibility of a nonlinear relationship between positive opioid effects and childhood adversity scores. Future research should assess the link between childhood adversity, subjective effects, and use of the prescribed opioids after surgery.&nbsp;</p>
You should fill this box only if you chose 'All or part of the results presented in this preprint are based on data'. URL must start with http:// or https://
You should fill this box only if you chose 'Scripts were used to obtain or analyze the results'. URL must start with http:// or https://
You should fill this box only if you chose 'Codes have been used in this study'. URL must start with http:// or https://
Childhood trauma; childhood adversity; opioids; pleasure; liking; subjective effects; reward; analgesics; surgery; oxycodone; remifentanil.
NonePlease indicate the methods that may require specialised expertise during the peer review process (use a comma to separate various required expertises).
Medical Sciences, Social sciences
e.g. John Doe john@doe.com
No need for them to be recommenders of PCI Registered Reports. Please do not suggest reviewers for whom there might be a conflict of interest. Reviewers are not allowed to review preprints written by close colleagues (with whom they have published in the last four years, with whom they have received joint funding in the last four years, or with whom they are currently writing a manuscript, or submitting a grant proposal), or by family members, friends, or anyone for whom bias might affect the nature of the review - see the code of conduct
e.g. John Doe john@doe.com
2023-02-02 08:29:18
Chris Chambers