Submit a report

Announcements

Please note that we will be CLOSED to ALL SUBMISSIONS from 1 December 2024 through 12 January 2025 to give our recommenders and reviewers a holiday break.

We are recruiting recommenders (editors) from all research fields!

Your feedback matters! If you have authored or reviewed a Registered Report at Peer Community in Registered Reports, then please take 5 minutes to leave anonymous feedback about your experience, and view community ratings.

576

Functional MRI brain state occupancy in the presence of cerebral small vessel disease -- a pre-registered replication analysis of the Hamburg City Health Studyuse asterix (*) to get italics
Thies Ingwersen, Carola Mayer, Marvin Petersen, Benedikt M. Frey, Jens Fiehler, Uta Hanning, Simone Kühn, Jürgen Gallinat, Raphael Twerenbold, Christian Gerloff, Bastian Cheng, Götz Thomalla, Eckhard Schlemm, Please use the format "First name initials family name" as in "Marie S. Curie, Niels H. D. Bohr, Albert Einstein, John R. R. Tolkien, Donna T. Strickland"
2024
<p><strong>Objective</strong>: To replicate recent findings on the association between the extent of cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD), functional brain network dedifferentiation, and cognitive impairment.</p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong> We analyzed demographic, imaging, and behavioral data from the prospective population-based Hamburg City Health Study.<br>Using a fully prespecified analysis pipeline, we estimated discrete brain states from structural and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).<br>In a multiverse analysis, we varied brain parcellations and functional MRI confound regression strategies.<br>The severity of cSVD was operationalized as the volume of white matter hyperintensities of presumed vascular origin.<br>Processing speed and executive dysfunction were quantified using the Trail Making Test (TMT).</p> <p><strong>Hypotheses:</strong> We hypothesized a) that a greater volume of supratentorial white matter hyperintensities would be associated with less time spent in functional MRI-derived brain states of high fractional occupancy;<br>and b) that less time spent in these high-occupancy brain states is associated with a longer time to completion in part B of the TMT.&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> High-occupancy brain states were characterized by activation or suppression of the default mode network.&nbsp;<br>Every 5.1-fold increase in WMH volume was associated with a 0.94-fold reduction in the odds of occupying DMN-related brain states (P 5.01e-8). Every 5% increase in time spent in high-occupancy brain states was associated with a 0.98-fold reduction in the TMT-B completion time (P 0.0116).&nbsp;<br>Findings were robust across most brain parcellations and confound regression strategies.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> We successfully replicated previous findings on the association between cSVD, functional brain occupancy, and cognition in an independent sample.&nbsp;<br>The data provide further evidence for a functional network dedifferentiation hypothesis of cSVD-related cognitive impairment.&nbsp;<br>Further research is required to elucidate the mechanisms underlying these associations.&nbsp;</p>
You should fill this box only if you chose 'All or part of the results presented in this preprint are based on data'. URL must start with http:// or https://
You should fill this box only if you chose 'Scripts were used to obtain or analyze the results'. URL must start with http:// or https://
You should fill this box only if you chose 'Codes have been used in this study'. URL must start with http:// or https://
Brain states, Cerebral small vessel disease, Cognition, Dynamic connectivity, Replication, Resting-state MRI, Spatial coactivation pattern
NonePlease indicate the methods that may require specialised expertise during the peer review process (use a comma to separate various required expertises).
Life Sciences, Medical Sciences
No need for them to be recommenders of PCI Registered Reports. Please do not suggest reviewers for whom there might be a conflict of interest. Reviewers are not allowed to review preprints written by close colleagues (with whom they have published in the last four years, with whom they have received joint funding in the last four years, or with whom they are currently writing a manuscript, or submitting a grant proposal), or by family members, friends, or anyone for whom bias might affect the nature of the review - see the code of conduct
e.g. John Doe [john@doe.com]
2023-10-17 09:53:02
Robert McIntosh