Submit a report

Announcements

Please note that we will be CLOSED to ALL SUBMISSIONS from 1 December 2024 through 12 January 2025 to give our recommenders and reviewers a holiday break.

We are recruiting recommenders (editors) from all research fields!

Your feedback matters! If you have authored or reviewed a Registered Report at Peer Community in Registered Reports, then please take 5 minutes to leave anonymous feedback about your experience, and view community ratings.

664

The Harmful Dysfunction Analysis applied to the concept of behavioral addiction: A secondary analysis of data from the Health Behaviour in School - aged Children 2018use asterix (*) to get italics
Simone Amendola, Michael P. Hengartner, Jerome C. WakefieldPlease use the format "First name initials family name" as in "Marie S. Curie, Niels H. D. Bohr, Albert Einstein, John R. R. Tolkien, Donna T. Strickland"
2024
<p>Objective: The present study is an attempt to advance the debate on the validity of the diagnosis of gaming disorder and other specified disorders due to addictive behaviours by improving the differentiation between excessive/high involvement versus pathological involvement. The principal aim of the study is to explore the usefulness of the Harmful Dysfunction Analysis (HDA) in identifying individuals with pathological social media use as an alternative approach to the study of behavioral addictions while also analyzing similarities and differences with DSM-5-TR-based scoring adopting criteria for internet gaming and substance use disorders.&nbsp;</p> <p>Method: The present study will use Swiss data (N = 7,510) from the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Study 2018, a World Health Organization collaborative cross-national study of adolescent health and well-being. First, convergence between different scoring methods (HDA and DSM-5-TR-based) will be examined. Second, groups based on each scoring method (i.e., non-overlapping cases) will be compared on measures of physical health (physical activity and body mass index) and mental health (psychosomatic health, life satisfaction, school well-being). Adjusted models for age, gender, migration status, and family affluence will also be tested. Data from Hungary (N = 3,789) was selected to repeat the analysis as part of a sensitivity investigation. &nbsp;</p> <p>Results: A detailed summary of the results of the above analysis will be provided in the text of the manuscript while the results of the sensitivity analysis will be reported as supplementary material.&nbsp;</p> <p>Conclusions: The conclusions will consist of a description of the research and clinical implications of the findings. The limitations of the study will be discussed as well as recommendations for future research applying the HDA.&nbsp;</p>
You should fill this box only if you chose 'All or part of the results presented in this preprint are based on data'. URL must start with http:// or https://
You should fill this box only if you chose 'Scripts were used to obtain or analyze the results'. URL must start with http:// or https://
You should fill this box only if you chose 'Codes have been used in this study'. URL must start with http:// or https://
harmful dysfunction analysis; theoretical framework; addictive behavior; normal engagement; normal involvement
NonePlease indicate the methods that may require specialised expertise during the peer review process (use a comma to separate various required expertises).
Social sciences
Joel Billieux suggested: Dear colleagues, , Joel Billieux suggested: I am really sorry to decline, but I am myself engaged with too much editorial work at that time to accept this review. I can suggest to ask Lois.Fournier@unil.ch or Charlotte Eben (currently at UBC in Vancouver) or Josip Razum to perform this review. Best regards, Joel Billieux, Veli-Matti Karhulahti suggested: jaroslava.bocanova@smail.unipo.sk, Loïs Fournier suggested: Joël Billieux (joel.billieux@unil.ch), Jospi Razum suggested: Alexandre Infanti
e.g. John Doe john@doe.com
No need for them to be recommenders of PCI Registered Reports. Please do not suggest reviewers for whom there might be a conflict of interest. Reviewers are not allowed to review preprints written by close colleagues (with whom they have published in the last four years, with whom they have received joint funding in the last four years, or with whom they are currently writing a manuscript, or submitting a grant proposal), or by family members, friends, or anyone for whom bias might affect the nature of the review - see the code of conduct
e.g. John Doe john@doe.com
2024-01-12 10:22:01
Andrew Jones
Daniel Dunleavy