Submit a report

Announcements

Please note that we will be CLOSED to ALL SUBMISSIONS from 1 December 2024 through 12 January 2025 to give our recommenders and reviewers a holiday break.

We are recruiting recommenders (editors) from all research fields!

Your feedback matters! If you have authored or reviewed a Registered Report at Peer Community in Registered Reports, then please take 5 minutes to leave anonymous feedback about your experience, and view community ratings.

796

Independent Comparative Evaluation of the Pupil Neon - A New Mobile Eye-trackeruse asterix (*) to get italics
Valentin Foucher, Alina Krug, Marian SauterPlease use the format "First name initials family name" as in "Marie S. Curie, Niels H. D. Bohr, Albert Einstein, John R. R. Tolkien, Donna T. Strickland"
2024
<p>Due to the rapid adoption of (mobile) eye-tracking devices in both academic and consumer research, it becomes more important that the increasing number of datasets is based on reliable recordings. This study provides an independent evaluation of the Pupil Neon (Pupil Labs GmbH), one of the newest and most affordable mobile eye-trackers, by comparing its performance on a variety of tasks to the EyeLink 1000 Plus (SR Research Ltd.). Using Ehinger et al. (2019)’s test battery, a set of 10 tasks evaluated the accuracy and its decay over time of some of the most common eye-tracking-related parameters: fixations, saccades, smooth pursuit, pupil dilation, microsaccades, blinks, and the influence of head motion on accuracy. Gaze position, eye movements and pupil diameter associated with each task were recorded simultaneously by the two eye-trackers and compared concurrently. The results provide some ideas on what singularities should be expected by the newer Pupil Neon for the recording of specific eye movements or the performance in various kinds of tasks.</p>
You should fill this box only if you chose 'All or part of the results presented in this preprint are based on data'. URL must start with http:// or https://
You should fill this box only if you chose 'Scripts were used to obtain or analyze the results'. URL must start with http:// or https://
You should fill this box only if you chose 'Codes have been used in this study'. URL must start with http:// or https://
Eye-tracker, Eye-tracking, Gaze detection, Accuracy, Precision, Pupil dilation, Smooth pursuit, Microsaccades, Fixations, Blinks, Head movements, Calibration decay, EyeLink 1000, Pupil Neon.
NonePlease indicate the methods that may require specialised expertise during the peer review process (use a comma to separate various required expertises).
Engineering, Life Sciences, Social sciences
No need for them to be recommenders of PCI Registered Reports. Please do not suggest reviewers for whom there might be a conflict of interest. Reviewers are not allowed to review preprints written by close colleagues (with whom they have published in the last four years, with whom they have received joint funding in the last four years, or with whom they are currently writing a manuscript, or submitting a grant proposal), or by family members, friends, or anyone for whom bias might affect the nature of the review - see the code of conduct
e.g. John Doe [john@doe.com]
2024-05-29 10:29:06
Rima-Maria Rahal